ReviewClinics and practice2026
Acute Aortic Syndrome: From Risk Factors to Hospital Burden and Healthcare Resource Utilization.
Review in Clinics and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) comprises acute aortic dissection, intramural haematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and limited intimal tear, conditions that require rapid recognition because mortality and resource use are strongly influenced by time to diagnosis, anatomical extent, malperfusion, and the need for emergency surgical or endovascular intervention. This revised narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on clinical, genetic, environmental, and health-system determinants of prolonged hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) utilisation, bed occupancy, and costs in patients with AAS. Beyond summarising established risk factors, the review adds a resource-oriented framework that links hypertension, advanced age, female sex, smoking-related comorbidity, hereditary aortopathies, haemodynamic instability, malperfusion, delayed diagnosis, operative complexity, and postoperative complications to measurable downstream outcomes such as ICU length of stay, total hospital length of stay, reoperation, readmission, and longitudinal imaging surveillance. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for relevant studies, registries, guideline documents, and cost analyses published between January 2000 and May 2026, with particular emphasis on studies from the last five years. The review was not designed as a meta-analysis; therefore, effect estimates are interpreted according to study design and generalisability. AAS imposes a disproportionate burden on hospital systems because high-risk patients often require advanced imaging, prolonged haemodynamic monitoring, complex open or endovascular repair, ICU care, and lifelong follow-up. Earlier diagnosis, structured risk stratification, targeted genetic evaluation, aggressive control of modifiable risk factors, and system-level pathways such as dedicated aortic networks may shorten hospital stay and reduce avoidable costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.