Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505634›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Identifying Distinct Antibiotic Behavioural Profiles in Singapore's General Population: A Latent Class Analysis.

Huiling Guo, Angela Chow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huiling GuoDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8730-6349
Angela ChowDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4063-736X

Funding

National Medical Research Council NMRC/HSRG/0083/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInappropriate antibiotic use for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) is common. However, existing research typically examines single indicators or broad categories of misuse practices, without considering the probabilistic and co-occurring nature of varying behaviours. This study aims to identify and characterise distinct antibiotic behavioural profiles within a general population to inform personalised interventions.

methodsThis is a broadly representative population-based study of adult Singapore residents between November 2020 and January 2021. Latent class analysis was first performed to identify distinct profiles, followed by multinomial logistic regression to determine individual characteristics associated with each profile, with interaction effects examined.

resultsAmongst 2004 respondents, the majority were "antibiotic appropriates" (53.0%), followed by "antibiotic avoiders" (24.9%), and "antibiotic seekers" (22.2%). "Antibiotic seekers" expected antibiotics for cold/flu, hopped between doctors to source antibiotics, used leftover antibiotics, stopped antibiotic courses prematurely and perceived antibiotics as harmless and useful for treating cold/flu. Individuals with poor knowledge of antibiotic use (AOR 3.71, 95% CI 2.89-4.76,

conclusionsApproximately one-in-five Singapore residents are antibiotic seekers. Targeted education during multiple clinic visits, given the high trust in doctors, can address antibiotic knowledge gaps and misperceptions, reducing antibiotic misuse.

Indexed as

antibiotic behavioural profilesantimicrobial resistancegeneral populationlatent class analysisSingapore

Identifiers

PMID42505634
PMCPMC13403971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.