Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505616›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Rectal Bacteria and Antibiotic Resistance in Zoo Animals in Algeria.

Khayreddine Choual, Sofiane Tamendjari, Maria Francesca Peruzy, Farida Bouzebda Afri, Zoubir Bouzebda, Ridah Hadj Aissa, Nicoletta Murru, Alexis Ribas Salvador

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Khayreddine ChoualDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Mohamed Cherif Messaadia University, Souk Ahras 41000, Algeria.
Sofiane TamendjariDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Mohamed Cherif Messaadia University, Souk Ahras 41000, Algeria.
Maria Francesca PeruzyDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Via Federico Delpino 1, 80137 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9148-3671
Farida Bouzebda AfriDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Mohamed Cherif Messaadia University, Souk Ahras 41000, Algeria.
Zoubir BouzebdaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Institute of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Mohamed Cherif Messaadia University, Souk Ahras 41000, Algeria.
Ridah Hadj AissaVeterinary Service, Zoo Mansourah Park, Mansourah, Route Nationale N7, Tlemcen 13000, Algeria.
Nicoletta MurruDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Via Federico Delpino 1, 80137 Naples, Italy.
Alexis Ribas SalvadorDepartment of Biology, Healthcare and Environment, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Science, Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1256-3316

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesHealthy animals can harbor complex and diverse bacterial communities, including pathogenic taxa capable of causing disease and mortality, and individuals that are kept in zoos may act as asymptomatic carriers of a broad range of pathogens. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the rectal bacterial microbiota of multiple animal classes (reptiles, birds, and mammals), maintained in enclosures, identify known or emerging bacterial pathogens, and characterize the antibiotic resistance profiles of the isolated strains.

methodsA total of 40 samples were collected by rectal swabbing for bacteriological analysis from 31 different animal species living in enclosures in four Algerian zoos. The isolated and identified bacterial strains were tested against certain antibiotics used in human and veterinary medicine. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences in bacterial isolation among animal classes, sex, age categories, and zoological facilities, as well as the degree of similarity between isolated strains based on their antibiotic resistance profiles.

resultsA total of 94 bacterial isolates were recovered from 40 fecal samples. Overall, the bacterial isolates belonged to seven families, 13 genera, and 16 taxa. The families identified were

conclusionThis study shows the first report that vertebrates in Algerian zoos can harbor a diverse range of cultivable bacteria, often with polymicrobial carriage. Antimicrobial resistance patterns were generally consistent with commonly used veterinary drugs. Overall, these findings contribute to a better understanding of the composition of rectal bacterial carriage in zoos.

Indexed as

Algeriaantibiotic resistancecaptive wild animalsdomestic animalsrectal bacterial diversity

Identifiers

PMID42505616
PMCPMC13403926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.