Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505598›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Artificial Intelligence in Bacteriophage Science: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Applications, Challenges, and Translational Opportunities.

Jamil Allen G Fortaleza, Kevin Smith P Cabuhat, Herminiño C Lagunzad, Warren B Panizales, Jowi Tsidkenu Pili Cruz, Joel G Matamis, Jose Edwardo R Mamaat, Amelda C Libres, Rich Milton R Dulay, Jose Jurel M Nuevo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The future of pharmaceuticals: strategic foresight in an era of uncertainty.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jamil Allen G FortalezaNational University, Manila 1008, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0001-7133-3580
Kevin Smith P CabuhatDepartment of Biology, College of Science, De La Salle University, Manila 1004, Philippines.
Herminiño C LagunzadNational University, Manila 1008, Philippines.ORCID 0009-0006-6157-5766
Warren B PanizalesNational University, Manila 1008, Philippines.
Jowi Tsidkenu Pili CruzDepartment of Biology, College of Science, De La Salle University, Manila 1004, Philippines.ORCID 0009-0000-9755-6352
Joel G MatamisSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, St. Dominic College of Asia, Bacoor 4102, Philippines.
Jose Edwardo R MamaatDepartment of Medical Technology, Far Eastern University, Manila 1015, Philippines.
Amelda C LibresCollege of Medical Laboratory Science, Liceo de Cagayan University, Cagayan de Oro City 9000, Philippines.
Rich Milton R DulayDepartment of Biology, College of Science, De La Salle University, Manila 1004, Philippines.
Jose Jurel M NuevoCollege of Medical Laboratory Science, Our Lady of Fatima University, Valenzuela City 1440, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance and persistent biofilm-associated infections have renewed interest in bacteriophages as alternatives or complements to conventional antibiotics. However, broader therapeutic adoption remains constrained by slow phage discovery, incomplete genome characterization, narrow host range, complex therapeutic matching, and manufacturing variability. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers computational approaches that may help address several of these limitations. This comprehensive narrative review discusses current AI applications across the bacteriophage pipeline, including metagenomic phage discovery, genome annotation, phage-host interaction prediction, personalized phage selection, cocktail optimization, and phage-antibiotic combination design. The review also examines AI-assisted synthetic biology approaches, including receptor-binding protein redesign, CRISPR-enabled engineering, generative genome design, and biosafety screening, as well as emerging applications in bioprocess optimization, yield prediction, purification analytics, quality assurance, and supply-chain management. Current evidence suggests that AI may accelerate phage identification, improve host-range prediction, support therapeutic optimization, and strengthen manufacturing consistency, potentially facilitating the transition of phage therapy from individualized rescue interventions toward more scalable antimicrobial platforms. Nevertheless, major limitations remain, including fragmented, taxonomically biased datasets; limited external validation; restricted interpretability; privacy concerns; biosafety oversight; and evolving regulatory frameworks. Future progress will depend on standardized datasets, multimodal validation, scalable manufacturing systems, experimental and clinical verification, and coordinated regulatory development.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancegenome annotationmachine learningphage optimizationsynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID42505598
PMCPMC13405602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.