ReviewDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Hemophilia in Mexico: Updated Consensus Recommendations on Diagnosis, Treatment and Gene Therapy.
Review in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
50 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemophilia is an X-linked inherited bleeding disorder, classified as type A or type B. Therapeutic advances offer new treatment options that improve disease control and reduce associated complications, including inhibitor development and hemophilic arthropathy. This document aims to update the Mexican hemophilia consensus, reviewing current evidence on diagnosis and management, and addressing gaps in the treatment and follow-up of patients in Mexico, aligning local needs with international recommendations. A PubMed literature search covering the last five years (up to September 2025) was conducted, prioritizing consensus statements, guidelines, and systematic reviews. Using the Delphi methodology, a structured questionnaire was submitted electronically to forty-four experts. Aspects without initial agreement were discussed at an in-person meeting. Consensus was defined as at least 80% of votes in favor. Recommendations were issued across six domains: laboratory diagnosis, genetic testing, management of hemophilia A and B without and with inhibitors, adjuvant treatments, and gene therapy. The recommendations address prophylaxis with coagulation factor concentrates, non-factor therapies, immune tolerance induction, perioperative management, pain management, and eligibility criteria and follow-up protocols for gene therapy with adeno-associated viral vectors. This consensus provides updated, evidence-based recommendations adapted to the Mexican healthcare context, identifying priority areas, including timely access to non-factor therapies and gene therapy, development of a national referral network for complex cases, and inclusion of novel therapeutic agents in the institutional essential medicines list, with the aim of improving the quality of life of people with hemophilia in Mexico.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.