Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505585›Full record

ArticleDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Sex-, Age-, and Projection-Related Variability in Pneumothorax and Pulmonary Mass Detection Frequencies on Chest Radiographs: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Josef Yayan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Josef YayanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Witten/Herdecke University, Heusnerstr. 40, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8363-621X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChest radiography remains one of the most widely used imaging modalities for the detection of thoracic abnormalities, including pneumothorax and pulmonary masses. However, the frequency with which these findings are identified may vary according to demographic characteristics and radiographic acquisition techniques. Understanding such variability is important for interpreting large imaging datasets and may improve diagnostic assessment and epidemiological research. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate sex-, age-, and projection-related differences in the dataset-derived detection frequencies of pneumothorax and pulmonary mass annotations in a large chest radiograph dataset.

methodsA retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 112,120 frontal chest radiographs obtained from 30,805 adult patients in the NIH ChestX-ray14 dataset was performed. Only anteroposterior (AP) and posteroanterior (PA) projections were included. Patients younger than 18 years, radiographs lacking demographic metadata, and lateral projections were excluded. Pneumothorax and pulmonary mass annotations were defined according to the corresponding NIH ChestX-ray14 labels generated from radiology reports using natural language processing. Patients were stratified according to sex and age group. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, adjusted odds ratios (adjusted ORs), image-level multivariable logistic regression analyses, and corresponding patient-level generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses to account for repeated radiographs from the same patient. Sensitivity analyses, including simulated annotation misclassification scenarios, were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the observed associations.

resultsA total of 4988 pneumothorax and 5588 pulmonary mass annotations were identified. Pneumothorax detection frequencies were significantly higher among females aged 41-80 years (adjusted OR range: 0.66-0.68;

conclusionsDetection frequencies of pneumothorax and pulmonary mass annotations varied systematically according to sex, age, and projection type, demonstrating substantial demographic and technical variability within a large chest radiograph dataset. These findings highlight the importance of considering demographic characteristics and imaging acquisition factors when interpreting large chest radiograph datasets. Because the findings were based on NLP-derived dataset annotations rather than reference-standard diagnoses, they should be interpreted as dataset-level associations rather than estimates of disease prevalence. Improved recognition of demographic and projection-related variability may contribute to more accurate interpretation of chest radiographs and more reliable imaging-based epidemiological research.

Indexed as

age differenceschest radiographydiagnostic imagingepidemiologypneumothoraxpulmonary massradiographic projectionrespiratory diseasessex differencesthoracic imaging

Identifiers

PMID42505585
PMCPMC13408617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.