ArticleDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Circulating 25-Hydroxy-Vitamin D Levels in Menopausal and Postmenopausal Women in Italy: A Comparison of Four Analytical Methods.
Article in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVitamin D is a key regulator of skeletal homeostasis, and hypovitaminosis D is highly prevalent among postmenopausal women, who are at increased risk of osteoporosis, sarcopenia, and related complications. Accurate assessment of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] is therefore essential. However, substantial variability exists among analytical methods, particularly between automated chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIA) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), the latter considered the reference technique. This study aimed to compare four analytical methods, three CLIA platforms, and LC-MS/MS for measuring circulating 25(OH)D levels in a cohort of menopausal and postmenopausal women.
methodsA total of 425 serum samples from menopausal and postmenopausal women representing the real-world distribution of vitamin D levels in this population were analyzed using three automated CLIA systems and LC-MS/MS. Method comparison, agreement, precision through quality control assessment, total error, and sigma were evaluated.
resultsThe evaluated CLIA platforms (Abbott, Snibe, and Siemens) showed strong correlation with LC-MS/MS, with r = 0.919, r = 0.978, and r = 0.879. Furthermore, all assays showed excellent precision (CV < 5%), with good-to-acceptable total error (TE) and Sigma-metric performance.
conclusionsIn conclusion, these findings demonstrate that while CLIA platforms offer a reliable and precise alternative for routine clinical use, these findings underscore the importance of method selection and result interpretation in the clinical assessment of vitamin D status in postmenopausal women. Furthermore, it highlights the ongoing need to minimize inter-assay variability and ensure consistent vitamin D assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.