ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Investigation of the Role of Body Shape on an Air Lubrication System Inspired by Penguins.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bubble-assisted drag reduction is a promising strategy for improving the energy efficiency of underwater bodies, but its effectiveness depends not only on air injection but also on the ability of the body geometry to retain bubbles close to the surface. Drawing inspiration from the air retention and bubble release mechanisms of penguin plumage, this study examines whether a simplified penguin-inspired geometry can enhance bubble coverage compared to a conventional axisymmetric body. Prototypes featuring a penguin-inspired shape and a torpedo shape, each equipped with an air diffuser and injection holes, were designed and evaluated in a dedicated towing tank. At low air pressure, the penguin-inspired body demonstrated a 31.5% reduction in drag coefficient compared to the condition without bubbles. In contrast, the torpedo-shaped body did not exhibit a reduction in drag coefficient under identical air-injection conditions. Both geometries showed diminished performance at higher pressures, likely due to bubble growth, coalescence, and decreased near-wall retention. These findings indicate that the effectiveness of bubble-assisted drag reduction is highly dependent on body geometry and that bioinspired body morphology may play a critical role in sustaining a layer rich in air bubbles near the surface. This study offers a preliminary experimental assessment of penguin-inspired air lubrication and identifies bubble size, air-flow control, and quantification of surface coverage as key areas for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.