ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Multi-Strategy Improved Aquila Optimizer with Adaptive Exploration and Individual-Level Stagnation Control: A Bio-Inspired Hybrid Metaheuristic and Its Engineering Applications.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metaheuristic algorithms remain a widely used class of solvers for solving complex, non-convex optimization problems where gradient information is unavailable, yet two failure modes continue to limit their practical reach: premature convergence caused by inadequate exploration diversity in late iterations and population stagnation that persists even when individual agents are nominally assigned to the exploration phase. This paper proposes the Stagnation-Aware Aquila Optimizer (SAAO), a hybrid algorithm that addresses both failure modes by embedding three targeted mechanisms into the Aquila Optimizer (AO) framework: (i) an adaptive exploration probability that responds to global fitness-improvement history; (ii) individual-level stagnation counters that force exploration re-entry for any agent that fails to improve for more than 30 consecutive iterations, regardless of the global phase schedule; and (iii) a diversity-maintenance module that reinitializes completely stagnant agents via random sampling or opposition-based learning. The biological repertoire of search operators is simultaneously enriched by incorporating four physics-grounded operators from the Animated Oat Optimization (AOO) algorithm centroid-guided dispersal, elite-guided dispersal, hygroscopic rolling, and spring ejection, alongside the original AO operators, yielding six complementary update rules partitioned equally between exploration and exploitation. The SAAO was evaluated against nine state-of-the-art algorithms on the CEC2015 benchmark and CEC2022 under identical experimental settings. The SAAO achieved the best Friedman mean rank on both suites and delivered competitive or superior performance against the nine baselines, with Wilcoxon rank-sum tests confirming statistically significant advantages over most competitors. On three classical engineering design problems, the SAAO achieved competitive outcomes. In a real-world equipment anomaly prediction task, an SAAO-optimized ensemble classifier attained 98.23% accuracy, surpassing the compared baseline models. These results establish SAAO as a robust and computationally tractable optimizer for both benchmark and applied settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.