Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505471›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2026

Nano-Carbon Biointerfaces in Biosensors for Cancer: A Scoping Review Mapping the Transition from Proof-of-Concept to Translational Applicability (2024-2026).

Barbara R Geraldino, Nilséia A Barbosa, Priscila M Galdino, Eduardo X F G Migon, Danielle Godoy, Tatiana Cunha, Fernando M Araújo-Moreira

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barbara R GeraldinoNuclear Engineering Department, Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7061-1574
Nilséia A BarbosaNuclear Engineering Department, Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-9455-7441
Priscila M GaldinoNuclear Engineering Department, Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, RJ, Brazil.
Eduardo X F G MigonNuclear Engineering Department, Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, RJ, Brazil.
Danielle GodoyNuclear Engineering Department, Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, RJ, Brazil.
Tatiana CunhaNuclear Engineering Department, Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1415-5380
Fernando M Araújo-MoreiraNuclear Engineering Department, Military Institute of Engineering (IME), Praça General Tibúrcio 80, Urca, Rio de Janeiro 22290-270, RJ, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5423-0405

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nano-carbon biointerfaces offer versatile platforms for cancer biomarker detection, but their progression from analytical proof-of-concept to clinically usable diagnostic evidence remains uneven. This scoping review maps 191 primary studies published from 2024 to 2026, covering nano-carbon families, surface chemistries, transduction architectures, biological matrices, and translational endpoints in cancer biosensing. The evidence space spans four nano-carbon dimensional classes: zero-dimensional carbon dots and quantum dots, one-dimensional carbon nanotubes, two-dimensional graphene-derived materials, and three-dimensional hybrid composites. Across these platforms, analytical sensitivity did not scale monotonically with nano-carbon dimensionality; instead, performance was shaped by the interaction between material architecture, biointerface chemistry, recognition strategy, transduction modality, and matrix context. A Translational Readiness Matrix showed that approximately 67% of studies remained at Low Evidence Level, whereas only approximately 10% reached Strong Evidence Level. Five recurring bottlenecks constrained translation: incomplete reproducibility reporting, limited Real-matrix Validation, scarce comparator-based clinical evidence, insufficient manufacturing-scale data, and weak regulatory or deployment planning. To address these gaps, this review proposes a nine-item minimum reporting checklist and a four-stage validation roadmap to support more reproducible, comparable, and clinically oriented nano-carbon biosensor development.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesNeoplasmsCarbonCarbon NanomaterialsCarbon Quantum DotsHumansNanotubes, CarbonCarbonNanotubes, Carbonbiointerfacescancer diagnosticsclinical translationlimit of detectionnano-carbon biosensorsnanomaterialsregulatory pathwayscoping reviewtranslational readiness

Identifiers

PMID42505471
PMCPMC13406662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.