ArticleBiosensors2026
Seasonal Variations and Indoor-Outdoor Characteristics of Fluorescent Aerosol Particles in Japanese Office Buildings.
Article in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescent aerosol particles (FAPs) are widely used as a real-time proxy for primary biological aerosol particles; however, their seasonal characteristics and size-resolved distributions in office environments remain poorly understood. In this study, FAPs were measured in ten office spaces located in four distinct regions of Japan during summer and winter using a real-time Bioaerosol Sensor. Indoor and outdoor FAP concentrations, indoor/outdoor ratios, and the size-resolved FAP fraction were evaluated. Indoor FAP concentrations were generally below 100 particles per liter (p/L), although peak concentrations of 140 p/L in summer and 195 p/L in winter were observed. Significant seasonal differences were detected in most offices, with several buildings showing higher concentrations in winter. Many offices exhibited relative humidity levels below 40% during winter, suggesting that dry indoor conditions may have promoted particle resuspension and contributed to elevated FAP concentrations. Indoor-outdoor comparisons suggested contributions from both indoor sources and outdoor infiltration. The size-resolved FAP fraction increased markedly with particle size, with median indoor values reaching 40-74% for 2.0-5.0 μm particles and 96-100% for particles > 5.0 μm. These findings indicate that FAPs in office environments are strongly associated with coarse particles and exhibit substantial seasonal and building-dependent variability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.