SynthesisBiosensors2026
Nanotechnology-Based Detection of Sickle Cell Disease and Thalassemia: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Biosensors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) and thalassemia are genetic disorders that necessitate accurate diagnosis for effective management and improved patient outcomes. The advent of nanotechnology has paved the way for innovative, precise detection methods, offering enhanced sensitivity and specificity. The present systematic review aims to assess the analytical performance of nanotechnology-based detection methods for SCD and thalassemia, with a focus on evaluating the analytical performance and identifying the most sensitive nanotechnology-based techniques. An extensive literature search was conducted across five databases (ScienceDirect, PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar), yielding 23 studies that met the inclusion criteria. These studies showcased the potential of nanotechnology-based methods for detecting SCD and thalassemia. The studies utilized diverse samples, including blood, serum, genomic DNA, and purchased oligonucleotides, with most reporting limit of detection (LOD) values. Specifically, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) exhibited exceptional sensitivity, with detection limits ranging from 2.6 aM to 0.035 pM. Surface modification and functionalization of AuNPs significantly enhance their detection capabilities. Other nanostructures, including silver nanoparticles, quantum dots, and graphene quantum dots, also demonstrate promising diagnostic capabilities. The results showed that nanotechnology-based methods demonstrated improved analytical sensitivity, with LOD ranging from 2.6 aM to 50 nM. This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the analytical performance of nanotechnology-based detection methods, shedding light on their potential to revolutionize diagnosis and treatment. Overall, it highlights the transformative potential of nanotechnology in improving molecular diagnostic accuracy for SCD and thalassemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.