Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505385›Full record

SynthesisCells2026

Platelet Storage Quality, Plasticizer Migration, and Transfusion Exposure Risk in DEHP Versus Non-DEHP Blood Storage Systems: A Mechanistic and Quantitative Comparative Analysis.

Ludwig Rayner Frontier Ramos, Wouter Van't Hof, Quentin Brebant, Richard R Gammon

Abstract readSystematic ReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ludwig Rayner Frontier RamosMedical Affairs, Macopharma USA, 3075 Breckinridge Blvd, Suite 405, Duluth, GA 30096, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6860-3156
Wouter Van't HofCleveland Cord Blood Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1251-0441
Quentin BrebantResearch and Development Department, Macopharma, 200 Chaussée Fernand Forest, 59200 Tourcoing, France.ORCID 0009-0003-8616-7054
Richard R GammonDepartment of Hematopathology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1175-9579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global transition away from di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP)-plasticized blood storage systems has raised important questions regarding platelet storage biology, transfusion performance, and recipient exposure to plasticizer-derived compounds. This systematic review evaluated platelet quality, plasticizer migration, and modeled transfusion exposure associated with DEHP-containing and DEHP-free platelet storage systems, including di(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHT), diisononyl cyclohexane-1,2-dicarboxylate (DINCH), butyryl trihexyl citrate (BTHC), and tri(2-ethylhexyl) trimellitate (TOTM). English-language studies reporting quantitative platelet storage, migration, or exposure endpoints were identified through structured Google Scholar searches through 1 May 2025, supplemented by manual reference screening. Eligible studies were required to specify plasticizer composition and report quantitative biologic, migration, or exposure outcomes. Narrative reviews, opinion articles, and studies lacking extractable quantitative data were excluded. The risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence were assessed using adapted domain- and GRADE-based frameworks for mechanistic and preclinical studies. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed for day 7 platelet pH, while the remaining endpoints were synthesized descriptively. Thirty-three studies were included, comprising experimental platelet storage studies, biomaterial migration analyses, toxicologic investigations, and exposure-modeling studies. Platelet metabolic stability, including pH, glucose consumption, lactate accumulation, and mitochondrial membrane potential, was preserved across plasticizer systems. Meta-analysis demonstrated no significant difference in pooled day 7 platelet pH between DEHP and non-DEHP systems (mean difference +0.025; 95% confidence interval -0.081 to +0.131). Platelet aggregation and agonist-induced activation responses were maintained in DEHP-free systems. Selected activation and apoptotic markers, including CD62P expression and Annexin V binding, were reduced in fully DEHP-free systems, suggesting decreased storage-related membrane stress. Migration studies consistently demonstrated substantially greater DEHP leaching than DINCH and DEHT, resulting in higher modeled cumulative transfusion exposure, particularly among pediatric and neonatal recipients. Evidence further indicated that DEHP-containing whole-blood collection systems contribute to downstream contamination of platelet products with DEHP and mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP). Interpretation is limited by heterogeneity in study design, storage platforms, assay methodologies, and the predominance of in vitro evidence. Overall, replacing DEHP with modern alternative plasticizers helps preserve transfusion-relevant platelet quality while potentially reducing plasticizer migration and modeled recipient exposure, thereby supporting the biologic and toxicologic rationale for transitioning to phthalate-free blood collection and storage systems.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsBlood PreservationBlood TransfusionDiethylhexyl PhthalatePlasticizersHumansDiethylhexyl PhthalatePlasticizersbiomaterial-cell interactionDEHPmigration of plasticizersmodeling transfusion exposureplatelet additive solutionplatelet storage lesionplatelet storage system

Identifiers

PMID42505385
PMCPMC13406900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.