ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Assessing Immune Fitness in Oncological Rehabilitation-Validity and Responsiveness of the Immune Status Questionnaire and Single-Item Scale.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImmune fitness (IF) reflects the body's ability to mount appropriate immune responses. Monitoring IF could improve tailored treatment in oncological rehabilitation. The Immune Status Questionnaire (ISQ) and the Single-Item Scale (SIS) were developed to assess IF, but their clinimetric properties in cancer rehabilitation remain unknown.
aimsTo evaluate the construct validity, responsiveness, and correlation between the ISQ and the SIS in oncological rehabilitation.
methodsThe study population included people participating in oncological rehabilitation during or within one year after medical treatment. Data were collected prospectively via questionnaires. Construct validity and responsiveness were assessed through predefined hypotheses, including correlations with fatigue, sleep problems, malnutrition risk, activity impairment, and physical functioning.
resultsIn total, 97 individuals were included in the analyses. Median ISQ and SIS scores were 8/10 and 7/10, respectively. Correlations ranged from r = -0.21 to r = -0.50. Only the SIS correlations with fatigue and physical functioning, and the ISQ correlation with fatigue, met the predefined thresholds. Responsiveness hypotheses were not confirmed.
conclusionsThe ISQ and the SIS demonstrated low construct validity and responsiveness in this population. IF scores were higher than expected. Correlations showed links between fatigue, physical functioning, and IF. Future research should develop tools tailored to the complex immune disturbances experienced by cancer survivors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.