ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026
Access to Guideline-Concordant Oncology Genomic Testing: A Qualitative Study of Black Cancer Patients and Oncology Providers.
Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic testing is a key component of precision oncology; however, Black patients receive genomic testing at lower rates. The purpose of this qualitative study was to identify individual and health system drivers of genomic testing disparities at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. We conducted interviews with 15 oncology providers and 11 Black cancer patients between September 2023 and October 2024. These patients were eligible for genomic testing based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, being diagnosed within last 10 years (2014-2023), at least 18 years old, and English-speaking. Providers included oncologists and oncology patient navigators. Topics included motivators, barriers, and knowledge of genomic testing and factors influencing decision-making. The Penchansky and Thomas theoretical framework of healthcare access (e.g., availability, accessibility, accommodation, affordability, and acceptability) guided thematic analysis. Among patients eligible for genomic testing, most participants (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.