Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505198›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026

The ClinicalTrials.gov Landscape of Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials: A 20-Year Analysis of Geographic Distribution and Growth Patterns: USMIRC Analysis.

Anas Zayad, Osama Younis, Carmel Awadallah, Ishita Kamboj, Abdelrhman Mohammed, Ahmad E Shatnawi, Amr Ali, Hamed Alzatary, Abdullah Mohammad Khan, Hira Shaikh and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Anas ZayadDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha 3050, Qatar.ORCID 0009-0006-7537-0112
Osama YounisSchool of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.ORCID 0009-0004-1027-554X
Carmel AwadallahDivision of Internal Medicine, St John Episcopal Hospital, Far Rockaway, NY 11691, USA.
Ishita KambojDepartment of Internal Medicine, Prime South GME-St. Joseph Medical Center, Kansas City, MO 64114, USA.
Abdelrhman MohammedDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Ahmad E ShatnawiFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Amr AliFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Hamed AlzataryInternal Medicine, Wellington Regional Medical Center, Wellington, FL 33414, USA.
Abdullah Mohammad KhanDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2166-2583
Hira ShaikhDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood & Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Omar AlkharabshehDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5299-4233
Mansi R ShahDivision of Hematology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Prerna MewawallaDivision of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15224, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-7464-6898
Joseph P McGuirkDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS 66160, USA.
Zahra MahmoudjafariDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS 66160, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3168-2521
Muhammad Umair MushtaqDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS 66160, USA.
Jeries KortDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS 66160, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9182-3931
Alma HabibDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS 66160, USA.
Shebli AtrashLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4547-7534
Al-Ola AbdallahDivision of Hematologic Malignancies & Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS 66160, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6603-185X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple myeloma (MM) has experienced rapid therapeutic innovation over the past two decades, leading to a substantial increase in clinical trial activity. However, the geographic distribution of these trials and the representation of different economic regions remain poorly characterized. We evaluated the global distribution, growth patterns, and phase-specific trends of MM clinical trials and trial sites across different economic settings.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective registry-based analysis interventional MM clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between January 2006 and January 2026. Trials were categorized based on the economic classification of participating countries using World Bank income groups and Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) status. Trial characteristics including phase, geographic distribution, number of participating sites, and site-years were analyzed. Population-adjusted trial density and compound annual growth rates (CAGR) were calculated to assess temporal trends and geographic representation.

resultsA total of 845 interventional MM clinical trials were identified during the study period. Trial activity was highest in the United States (337 trials, 39.9%), followed by international trials (271, 32.1%), high-income-OECD countries (129, 15.3%), and upper-middle-income countries (103, 12.2%), while high-income non-OECD countries contributed only a small fraction of trials. Trial activity increased substantially over time across all regions with the highest growth observed in upper-middle-income countries (CAGR 18.5%). The US demonstrated the highest population-adjusted trial density (0.99 per million population) and accounted for the largest number of trial sites and site-years. Phase-specific analyses revealed distinct geographic patterns. Phase 1 trials were predominantly conducted in the US and in international collaborative trials. Phase 3 trials were largely international, although the majority of participating sites remained located in the US and High-income countries that are members of the OECD (HIC-OECD).

conclusionsOver the past two decades, MM clinical trial activity has expanded globally but remains highly concentrated in the United States and high income-OECD countries, particularly with respect to trial sites and population-adjusted trial density. Although upper-middle-income countries have shown the fastest growth in trial activity expanding clinical trial infrastructure and strengthening international collaboration will be essential to promote a more equitable global distribution of MM research.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicMultiple MyelomaHumansRegistriesRetrospective Studiesclinical trialsgeographic distributionglobal healthhealth disparitiesinternational collaborationmultiple myelomaOECDoncology research equitypopulation-adjusted trial densityworld bank income classification

Identifiers

PMID42505198
PMCPMC13408958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.