Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505185›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2026

Imaging-Based Risk Stratification of IPMN Using a Structured Imaging Score: A Retrospective Proof-of-Concept Study.

Stefano Fusco, Hannes F Digomann, Sabrina Groß, Nisar Peter Malek, Eckhart Fröhlich, Tatjana Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefano FuscoSection of Gastroenterology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine 1, Medical Campus Lake Constance, 88048 Friedrichshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6093-4567
Hannes F DigomannDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Marienhospital Stuttgart, 70199 Stuttgart, Germany.
Sabrina GroßSection of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Hepatology, Infectiology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-2367-8699
Nisar Peter MalekSection of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Hepatology, Infectiology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Eckhart FröhlichSection of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Hepatology, Infectiology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2518-258X
Tatjana HoffmannSection of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Hepatology, Infectiology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesAccurate risk stratification of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) remains clinically challenging. This study evaluates a structured imaging-based scoring approach for IPMN risk stratification, referred to as the Tübingen Dignity Score (TDS), and compares its diagnostic performance with established methods.

methodsIn this retrospective study, imaging findings from patients with suspected IPMN were analyzed using MRI, CT, and ultrasound. The TDS was applied as an imaging-based scoring system. Diagnostic performance was assessed in a histopathological subset and compared with MRI-based assessment and Fukuoka criteria.

resultsMRI showed high sensitivity (94.4%) but limited specificity (57.1%). Fukuoka criteria showed high sensitivity (100%) and high specificity (91.3%) in this cohort, although with a lower positive predictive value. In contrast, the TDS showed high specificity (100%) and positive predictive value, but lower sensitivity (40%), reflecting a different diagnostic profile. These findings indicate a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity across the evaluated approaches. However, the limited number of malignant cases limits the robustness and generalizability of these estimates.

conclusionsThe TDS may serve as a complementary, imaging-based tool within a multimodal diagnostic framework for IPMN. Its potential value lies in supporting clinical decision-making in selected cases, particularly where established criteria yield inconclusive results. Given the limited sample size, retrospective single-center design, and exploratory nature of this study, external prospective multicenter validation is required before routine clinical application can be recommended.

Indexed as

Pancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSensitivity and Specificitycystic pancreas lesionFukuoka criteriaIPMNTDSTübingen Dignity Score

Identifiers

PMID42505185
PMCPMC13407742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.