ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Soft, Multi-Wavelength Photoplethysmography Enables Reliable Neonatal Blood Pressure Monitoring Via Error Stratification.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring is important for neonatal hemodynamic management. However, cuffless photoplethysmography (PPG) is still difficult to use clinically because acquisition-related errors and their effects on blood pressure estimation are not well understood. Most studies report only overall error, which can hide error patterns under different signal-quality and motion conditions. Here, we developed a soft multi-wavelength wearable that combines reflective and transmissive optical paths to record complementary PPG signals. We also built NEO-BP, a prospective clinical dataset containing synchronized multi-wavelength PPG and invasive arterial blood pressure waveforms from 42 neonates. In a held-out segment-level test set without excluding samples based on signal quality (n = 9378), the green-red-infrared (G+R+IR) model achieved mean absolute errors of 9.67 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and 6.17 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. Using this dataset, we established a retrospective descriptive subgroup error profile by stratifying estimation deviations across measurable acquisition and physiological conditions. Estimation errors increased under lower signal quality and stronger motion. These results identify error-prone acquisition states, support quality-aware interpretation of segment-level cuffless blood pressure estimates, and provide a basis for future models that estimate the error risk of individual readings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.