Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42505038›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026

Improved gene tree inference from removing alignment errors both from focal genes and when training substitution models.

Andrew L Wheeler, Chiragdeep Chatur, Peter W Goodman, Robert C Edgar, Gavin A Huttley, Joanna Masel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew L WheelerGenetics Graduate Interdisciplinary Program, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5347-5419
Chiragdeep ChaturDepartment of Computer Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Peter W GoodmanStatistics and Data Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-6807-1300
Robert C EdgarIndependent Researcher, Corte Madera, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7355-2541
Gavin A HuttleyResearch School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7224-2074
Joanna MaselDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7398-2127

Funding

Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Biomedical SystemsT32GM132008 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Ryan Gutenkunst, JOANNA MASEL · 2019 to 2026
$2.3M
National Institutes for Health T32 GM132008National Science Foundation DEB-2333243NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM132008University of Arizona Undergraduate Biology Research Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a key step in phylogenetic analysis and is prone to error. Unfortunately, algorithms that remove likely alignment errors from MSAs sometimes also remove informative residues, making phylogenetic tree inference worse. Here we present a novel MSA cleaning algorithm based on consensus between MSAs using a range of Hidden Markov Models and guide trees, named CLOAK (CLeaning On the basis of Alignment C(K)onsensus). CLOAK is a gentle filter, with a low false positive rate for removal from MSAs according to the BALiBASE benchmarks, while still removing a significant fraction of likely alignment errors. Gentle vs. stringent MSA filtering methods are appropriate for different tasks. We assess methods based on their ability to bring the gene trees of single copy orthologs closer to the accepted species tree. Amino acid substitution models trained on filtered MSAs improve gene tree inference, with stricter filtering methods providing the biggest model improvements. In contrast, it is gentler filtering of single gene MSAs that provides additional improvements to gene tree inference, with CLOAK performing best.

Indexed as

PhylogenySequence AlignmentAlgorithmsAmino Acid SubstitutionHidden Markov ModelsMarkov ChainsModels, Geneticalignment confidencedetecting selectionhomologyphylogenetic methodsphylogenomicssubstitution matrix

Identifiers

PMID42505038
PMCPMC13449614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.