ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Improved gene tree inference from removing alignment errors both from focal genes and when training substitution models.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- piqtree: a python package for seamless phylogenetic inference with IQ-TREE.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is a key step in phylogenetic analysis and is prone to error. Unfortunately, algorithms that remove likely alignment errors from MSAs sometimes also remove informative residues, making phylogenetic tree inference worse. Here we present a novel MSA cleaning algorithm based on consensus between MSAs using a range of Hidden Markov Models and guide trees, named CLOAK (CLeaning On the basis of Alignment C(K)onsensus). CLOAK is a gentle filter, with a low false positive rate for removal from MSAs according to the BALiBASE benchmarks, while still removing a significant fraction of likely alignment errors. Gentle vs. stringent MSA filtering methods are appropriate for different tasks. We assess methods based on their ability to bring the gene trees of single copy orthologs closer to the accepted species tree. Amino acid substitution models trained on filtered MSAs improve gene tree inference, with stricter filtering methods providing the biggest model improvements. In contrast, it is gentler filtering of single gene MSAs that provides additional improvements to gene tree inference, with CLOAK performing best.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.