ArticleGlobal change biology2026
Water Limits Radial Tree Growth More Than Light in an Everwet Subtropical Forest.
Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Everwet tropical forests, defined by the absence of a pronounced dry season, are globally significant carbon sinks, covering roughly 80% of Southeast Asian tropical forests, 30% of the Amazon basin, and 10% of the Congo Basin. Yet the climatic drivers of stem radial growth in these ecosystems remain understudied. The prevailing hypothesis is that growth is primarily light-limited, as persistent cloud cover constrains photosynthesis. Evaluating this assumption is critical as climate projections for the humid tropics point towards rising atmospheric evaporative demand, episodic drought, and reduced cloud cover, conditions whose net effect on woody growth remains unresolved. To address this gap, we deployed automated point dendrometers on 35 trees in an everwet subtropical forest with 3500 mm mean annual precipitation and no pronounced rainfall seasonality, collecting 2 years of hourly radial stem growth data alongside concurrent measurements of soil moisture, vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and light availability. Contrary to the prevailing light-limitation hypothesis, soil moisture and atmospheric evaporative demand were the primary determinants of both whether and how much growth occurred on any given day, even under these perennially wet conditions. Light availability and photoperiod enhanced growth magnitude when water was not limiting, but their effects were consistently smaller. Droughts occurring during the wetter, high-growth months had the greatest negative impact on annual stem increment, potentially reducing annual growth to just 20% of current levels. These results challenge long-standing assumptions of light-limited stem growth in everwet forests, which is critical for improving model projections of forest responses to climate change. Broader validation across tropical forests, combined with direct physiological measurements of carbon uptake and storage, will be essential to evaluate our working hypothesis that radial growth in these everwet ecosystems is ultimately more constrained by water availability than by carbon supply.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.