ReviewMolecular biology and evolution2026
Evolutionary dynamics of the arthropod molting machinery.
Review in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molting in Pancrustacea Is Characterized by Both Deeply Conserved and Recently Evolved Gene Modules.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exoskeletons define arthropods, providing support for segmented bodies and appendages while protecting against environmental stress and predation. Although ubiquitous, this evolutionarily variable feature has enabled arthropods to occupy diverse lifestyles and ecological niches, contributing to their unrivaled diversity. Because the chitinous cuticle is rigid, exoskeletons must be periodically shed and replaced as animals grow. Arthropods therefore develop through discrete molts, with conserved phases that progress from pre-molt preparation to ecdysis and post-molt maturation. These are tightly regulated developmental transitions controlled by a molecular toolkit comprising neuropeptides, hormone-synthesizing enzymes, receptors, and the early, fate, and late gene sets that activate and execute the molting process. Although genetic studies in model species have identified many components, major knowledge gaps remain, especially in noninsect arthropods. Advances in genome sequencing now enable comparative genomic analyses across diverse, previously understudied arthropod lineages to begin to address these gaps. We present a comprehensive comparative genomic survey of arthropods, sampling all four subphyla: Chelicerata, Myriapoda, Crustacea, and Hexapoda. Orthology inference and gene copy-number analyses contrast stable and dynamic components of the molting machinery across the phylum. Ancestral state reconstructions and phylogenetic reconciliations reveal gene duplication and loss dynamics and the evolutionary histories of key molting gene families. The inclusion of newly generated myriapod genomes addresses a major taxonomic gap and enables inferences of gene repertoire changes in the Mandibulata ancestor. The broad taxonomic representation enables a phylum-wide assessment to systematically evaluate, refine, and revise current understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of the molting genetic toolkit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.