Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42504960›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology and evolution2026

Evolutionary dynamics of the arthropod molting machinery.

Giulia Campli, Sagane Joye, Olga Volovych, Asya V Novikova, Ariel D Chipman, Marc Robinson-Rechavi, Robert M Waterhouse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Giulia CampliDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0008-7732-9222
Sagane JoyeDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4771-6113
Olga VolovychThe Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3932-8770
Asya V NovikovaThe Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel.ORCID 0009-0005-1989-8142
Ariel D ChipmanThe Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 9190401, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-6696-840X
Marc Robinson-RechaviDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-3329
Robert M WaterhouseSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4199-9052

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 198691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exoskeletons define arthropods, providing support for segmented bodies and appendages while protecting against environmental stress and predation. Although ubiquitous, this evolutionarily variable feature has enabled arthropods to occupy diverse lifestyles and ecological niches, contributing to their unrivaled diversity. Because the chitinous cuticle is rigid, exoskeletons must be periodically shed and replaced as animals grow. Arthropods therefore develop through discrete molts, with conserved phases that progress from pre-molt preparation to ecdysis and post-molt maturation. These are tightly regulated developmental transitions controlled by a molecular toolkit comprising neuropeptides, hormone-synthesizing enzymes, receptors, and the early, fate, and late gene sets that activate and execute the molting process. Although genetic studies in model species have identified many components, major knowledge gaps remain, especially in noninsect arthropods. Advances in genome sequencing now enable comparative genomic analyses across diverse, previously understudied arthropod lineages to begin to address these gaps. We present a comprehensive comparative genomic survey of arthropods, sampling all four subphyla: Chelicerata, Myriapoda, Crustacea, and Hexapoda. Orthology inference and gene copy-number analyses contrast stable and dynamic components of the molting machinery across the phylum. Ancestral state reconstructions and phylogenetic reconciliations reveal gene duplication and loss dynamics and the evolutionary histories of key molting gene families. The inclusion of newly generated myriapod genomes addresses a major taxonomic gap and enables inferences of gene repertoire changes in the Mandibulata ancestor. The broad taxonomic representation enables a phylum-wide assessment to systematically evaluate, refine, and revise current understanding of the evolutionary dynamics of the molting genetic toolkit.

Indexed as

ArthropodsBiological EvolutionMoltingAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationPhylogenyarthropod moltingevolutionary genomicsgene family evolution

Identifiers

PMID42504960
PMCPMC13449613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.