Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42504924›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Active dendrites enable robust spiking computations despite timing jitter.

Thomas S J Burger, Michael E Rule, Timothy O'Leary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas S J BurgerDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Michael E RuleDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4196-774X
Timothy O'LearyDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1029-0158

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council DTP studentshipERC 10.3030/716643Isaac Newton Trust and Leverhulme Fellowship ECF-2020-352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic action potentials exhibit long plateaus of many tens of milliseconds, outliving axonal spikes by an order of magnitude. The computational role of these slow events seems at odds with the need to rapidly integrate and relay information throughout large nervous systems. We propose that the timescale of dendritic potentials allows for reliable integration of asynchronous inputs. We develop a physiologically grounded model in which the extended duration of dendritic spikes equips each dendrite with a resettable memory of incoming signals. This provides a tractable model for capturing dendritic nonlinearities observed in experiments and in more complex, detailed models. Using this model, we show that long-lived, nonlinear dendritic plateau potentials allow neurons to spike reliably when confronted with asynchronous input spikes. We demonstrate this model supports non-trivial computations in a network solving an association/discrimination task using sparse spiking that is subject to timing jitter. This demonstrates a computational role for the specific timecourse of dendritic potentials in situations where decisions occur quickly, reliably, and with a low number of spikes. Our results provide empirically testable hypotheses for the role of dendritic action potentials in cortical function, as well as a potential bio-inspired means of realising neuromorphic spiking computations in analog hardware.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsDendritesModels, NeurologicalNeuronsAnimalsTime Factorscomputational biologydendriteselectrophysiologyion channelsneural networkneurosciencenoisenonespiking networkssystems biology

Identifiers

PMID42504924
PMCPMC13405625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.