ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2026
Advancing PTSD-Substance Use Comorbidity Treatment Research Through Applying FAIR and FACT Data Science Frameworks in
Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePosttraumatic stress (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) treatment research has been hampered by heterogeneous measures, inconsistent reporting, and sensitive data governance constraints that limit data synthesis and clinical translation. This manuscript describes how integrating FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles and FACT (Fairness, Accuracy, Confidentiality, Transparency) concepts can strengthen PTSD-SUD data science, with
methodWe identify key barriers to evidence accumulation in PTSD-SUD clinical trials and map FAIR+FACT-aligned practices across the research lifecycle (data acquisition, harmonization, analysis, sharing, and dissemination). We then illustrate implementation strategies using procedures from
resultsWe identify priority points where FAIR+FACT alignment improves reproducibility and validity while reducing participant risk, particularly for populations vulnerable to confidentiality harms and stigma. The
conclusionsFAIR+FACT integration offers a practical framework for advancing trustworthy PTSD-SUD treatment evidence. We provide specific recommendations for investigators, clinical trial networks, and funders/policymakers to institutionalize FAIR+FACT requirements and resource the personnel and infrastructure needed for ethical, reusable PTSD-SUD datasets. Routine adoption of interoperable metadata standards, rigorous documentation and code sharing, and trauma-informed governance can accelerate guideline development, strengthen policy relevance, and improve clinical decision-making for individuals with comorbid PTSD and SUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.