ArticleSexual and reproductive health matters2025
Rethinking abortion law reform in Malawi: a multi-method study.
Article in Sexual and reproductive health matters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite decades of sustained advocacy, Malawi retains one of the world's most restrictive criminal abortion laws. A draft Termination of Pregnancy Bill, developed in 2015 to propose semi-liberal reform to Malawi's abortion law, has yet to be enacted. In contrast, similar or less intensive advocacy efforts have resulted in liberalisation of abortion laws in other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including Zambia, South Africa, and Ethiopia. This qualitative case study examines the policy processes adopted by advocates and identifies potential pathways for abortion law reform in Malawi. Employing a multi-method approach, we conducted document analysis using the READ approach and semi-structured interviews with 14 key informants actively or formerly involved in Malawi's abortion law reform process. Data was analysed thematically using Bacchi's (2009) "What's the problem represented to be?" (WPR) theoretical framework. The findings revealed evidence-informed strategies aimed at strengthening future advocacy efforts: coordinated advocacy integrating established and emerging organisations; ongoing demographic and lived-experience evidence to counter stereotypes and expose harms; careful reframing of language (e.g. replacing "Termination of Pregnancy Bill" with motherhood-aligned titles); intensive community engagement via trusted local champions; strategic timing mindful of political cycles and U.S. funding pressures (including the reinstated Global Gag Rule); further litigation to clarify and expand existing legal scope; and adequate funding to counter well-resourced opposition and sustain rural outreach. Drawing comparative insights from surrounding Sub-Saharan African countries, we discuss drivers of reform and propose targeted strategies to advance abortion law liberalisation in Malawi and reduce mortality related to unsafe abortion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.