ReviewJournal of microscopy2026
Convergence of cryo-electron microscopy and artificial intelligence in integrative structural biology: A critical review of advances, synergies, and implications for molecular biophysics and drug discovery.
Review in Journal of microscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural biology has entered a period of rapid methodological change defined by the convergence of cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven structure prediction. Prior reviews have generally addressed cryo-EM instrumentation or AI structure prediction individually, or their combination primarily from a structural biology or drug discovery perspective; a microscopy-centred synthesis tracing this convergence from detector physics and image-processing workflows through validation standards to in situ cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET), while situating AI tools specifically as inputs to and complements of the cryo-EM workflow, has been comparatively underexplored. This review provides such a synthesis, organised around: (i) the instrumentation, image-processing, and validation advances underlying cryo-EM's resolution gains, including detector physics, contrast transfer function (CTF) estimation, Bayesian and deep-learning-based particle picking and reconstruction, and map-to-model validation and deposition; (ii) cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging (STA) for in situ structural biology, including deep generative approaches to heterogeneity analysis; and (iii) the AlphaFold2, AlphaFold3, and RoseTTAFold All-Atom systems, considered specifically in relation to how they interface with and depend upon cryo-EM data for model building, refinement, and validation. Building on this microscopy-centred account, we propose a three-tier classification framework for selecting between AI-primed, experiment-led, and in situ integrative pipelines, and we summarise performance, transparency, and accessibility differences between leading AI tools. We illustrate these methods with examples from membrane proteins, ion channels, and viral glycoproteins, and briefly note implications for structure-based drug design and for structural biology capacity in resource-limited settings. Throughout, we distinguish between demonstrated capability, exceptional proof-of-principle results, and routine practice, and identify the experimental and computational limitations that constrain each approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.