ArticleCureus2026
Evaluating Compliance With Advance Care Directives and Resuscitation Plan Documentation in Patients Who Experienced Cardiac Arrest at a Regional Australian Hospital: A Retrospective Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Advance Care Directives and Resuscitation Plans support patient-centred care for high-risk inpatients, particularly when clinical deterioration or end-of-life decision-making is anticipated. This audit aimed to evaluate compliance with Resuscitation Plan documentation requirements among patients who experienced an in-hospital cardiac arrest at a regional Australian hospital. Methods A retrospective clinical audit was conducted involving adult inpatients who experienced a cardiac arrest attended by the Medical Emergency Team over a 3.5-year period at a regional Australian hospital. Patients were identified from the ICU cardiac arrest logbook, and demographic, clinical, and documentation data were extracted from electronic medical records. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise documentation rates, comorbidities, admitting teams, Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls, and survival outcomes. Results Forty-seven inpatients experienced a cardiac arrest during the study period, with a mean age of 72.7 years and a mean pre-arrest length of hospital stay of 3.4 days. Only 17% had a documented Resuscitation Plan at the time of arrest, while 83% had none. Cardiovascular comorbidity was present in 85% of patients, and 23% had a MET response call before arrest; only three of these patients had a subsequent Resuscitation Plan documented. Eighteen patients survived their cardiac arrest, but only five had a Resuscitation Plan completed post-arrest. Conclusions Resuscitation Plan documentation was low in this elderly, high-risk inpatient cohort despite substantial comorbidity and a history of clinical deterioration in many patients. These findings suggest missed opportunities for earlier goals-of-care discussions and support targeted education and system-level interventions to improve documentation compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.