Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42504376›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Effect of Generational Differences on the Quality of Anaesthesia Care: A Narrative Review.

Anusha Balasubramanian, Sahanapanneer Selvam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anusha BalasubramanianAnaesthesiology, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.
Sahanapanneer SelvamAnaesthesiology, Shri Sathya Sai Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The healthcare workforce increasingly comprises multiple generations with differing values, communication styles, approaches to clinical decision-making, and levels of technology adoption. In anaesthesia, a speciality that relies on effective teamwork, rapid decision-making, and patient safety, these differences may influence the quality of care delivered. This narrative review examines how generational diversity among anaesthesia providers affects key domains of practice, including communication, clinical decision-making, technology adoption, patient safety, and work-related attitudes such as burnout and work-life balance. Senior anaesthesiologists contribute extensive clinical experience, crisis-management skills, and contextual judgment, whereas early-career clinicians often demonstrate stronger engagement with evidence-based practice, clinical guidelines, and digital technologies. While differences in communication styles, perceptions of hierarchy, and approaches to patient management may create challenges in perioperative care, they also provide opportunities for complementary learning and collaboration. Strategies such as structured communication, intergenerational mentorship, simulation-based training, and continuing professional development may help integrate the strengths of clinicians across career stages. Recognising and effectively managing generational differences can enhance teamwork, support patient safety, and improve the overall quality of anaesthesia services.

Indexed as

anaesthesia servicesgeneration gapintergenerational communicationpatient safetyworkforce diversity

Identifiers

PMID42504376
PMCPMC13401668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.