ReviewCureus2026
Effect of Generational Differences on the Quality of Anaesthesia Care: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The healthcare workforce increasingly comprises multiple generations with differing values, communication styles, approaches to clinical decision-making, and levels of technology adoption. In anaesthesia, a speciality that relies on effective teamwork, rapid decision-making, and patient safety, these differences may influence the quality of care delivered. This narrative review examines how generational diversity among anaesthesia providers affects key domains of practice, including communication, clinical decision-making, technology adoption, patient safety, and work-related attitudes such as burnout and work-life balance. Senior anaesthesiologists contribute extensive clinical experience, crisis-management skills, and contextual judgment, whereas early-career clinicians often demonstrate stronger engagement with evidence-based practice, clinical guidelines, and digital technologies. While differences in communication styles, perceptions of hierarchy, and approaches to patient management may create challenges in perioperative care, they also provide opportunities for complementary learning and collaboration. Strategies such as structured communication, intergenerational mentorship, simulation-based training, and continuing professional development may help integrate the strengths of clinicians across career stages. Recognising and effectively managing generational differences can enhance teamwork, support patient safety, and improve the overall quality of anaesthesia services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.