Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42504339›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Trust in Organ Allocation Systems and Attitudes Toward Organ Donation Among Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease and Their Relatives: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Giasar Chasan, Evanthia Tsalkidou, Ilker Memet, Sempaetin Gkasil, Lana Kalaitsidou, Gregory Trypsianis, Christos Argyriou, Christos Tsalikidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giasar ChasanSurgery, General Hospital of Komotini, Komotini, GRC.
Evanthia TsalkidouSurgery, General Hospital of Komotini, Komotini, GRC.
Ilker MemetSurgery, General Hospital of Komotini, Komotini, GRC.
Sempaetin GkasilEmergency, General Hospital of Komotini, Komotini, GRC.
Lana KalaitsidouEmergency, General Hospital of Komotini, Komotini, GRC.
Gregory TrypsianisMedical Statistics, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, GRC.
Christos ArgyriouVascular Surgery, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, GRC.
Christos TsalikidisGeneral Surgery, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Alexandroupolis, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrust in healthcare systems is an important factor in patient decision-making and attitudes toward organ donation.

objectiveThis study aims to examine the association between trust in organ allocation systems and attitudes toward organ donation, willingness to donate, knowledge, and concerns regarding fairness and transparency among patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and their relatives. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted between December 2020 and September 2021 at two tertiary healthcare centers in Greece. Participants were recruited from dialysis units and outpatient nephrology clinics. A total of 178 individuals participated, including 104 patients with ESRD and 74 first-degree relatives. Patients and relatives were analyzed as independent groups. The questionnaire was adapted from previously published studies assessing attitudes toward organ donation, trust in healthcare systems, and transplantation-related decision-making. The instrument was reviewed for content relevance, pilot-tested before administration, and revised for clarity, although it was not formally validated. Data were collected through researcher-administered structured interviews. The questionnaire assessed trust in organ allocation systems, attitudes toward organ donation, willingness to donate, knowledge, and demographic characteristics. Higher education was defined as completion of post-secondary, university, or postgraduate education. Participants responding "no" to the question "Do you trust the organ allocation system?" were classified as having limited trust. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using chi-square tests. No substantial missing data were identified, and all completed questionnaires were included in the analysis. No adjustment for multiple comparisons was performed because of the exploratory nature of the study. Data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 26 (IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.), and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

resultsA total of 46% of participants reported limited trust in organ allocation systems. Lower trust was significantly associated with reduced willingness to donate organs (p = 0.02) and increased concerns regarding fairness and transparency (p = 0.01). Relatives reported lower levels of trust than patients (52% vs. 41%, p = 0.04).

conclusionsTrust in organ allocation systems was closely associated with attitudes toward organ donation and willingness among patients with ESRD and their relatives. Relatives reported lower levels of trust in organ allocation systems than patients did. Strengthening transparency, communication, and institutional credibility may be associated with greater willingness to donate and improved engagement with transplantation systems. These findings may help inform trust-based strategies and policy interventions aimed at improving organ donation systems.

Indexed as

dialysisend-stage renal diseasehealthcare trusthealth literacyhealth policyorgan allocationorgan donationtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID42504339
PMCPMC13401807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.