Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42504209›Full record

ArticleSAGE open nursing

Integrating the Fundamentals of Care Framework Into Clinical Practice: An Exploratory Pre-Post Study of Nurses' Perceived Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation.

Mia Ingerslev Loft, Charlotte Fredborg Brinck, Maria Brudsø, Stina Marlo Posborg, Sidsel Goor Pedersen, Rie Forsberg, Lone Lundbak Mathiesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mia Ingerslev LoftDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0009-3302
Charlotte Fredborg BrinckDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria BrudsøDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Stina Marlo PosborgDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sidsel Goor PedersenDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rie ForsbergDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lone Lundbak MathiesenDepartment of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Missed Nursing Care is a persistent global problem associated with adverse patient outcomes. The Fundamentals of Care Framework provides a conceptual structure for delivering person-centred, high-quality nursing care. However, limited empirical evidence exists on how the Framework can be systematically integrated into routine clinical practice through structured implementation strategies. Objective: To evaluate the effect of an implementation strategy for integrating the Fundamentals of Care Framework into clinical practice on staff perceptions of capability, opportunity, and motivation to deliver fundamental nursing care. Methods: An exploratory single-group pre-post study was conducted using paired questionnaire data collected before and after implementation of a structured, theory-informed implementation strategy designed to support integration of the Fundamentals of Care Framework into daily nursing practice. Nurses' perceived behavioural determinants were assessed using a questionnaire informed by the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour model. Analyses focused on within-person change and estimation of directional trends. Given the exploratory nature and limited sample size, emphasis was placed on descriptive statistics and confidence intervals rather than hypothesis testing. Results: Pre- and post-implementation data from the same individuals (paired data) suggested small and variable changes across behavioural domains following implementation. Directional trends indicated increases in perceived capability and opportunity, while motivation appeared relatively stable over time. Confidence intervals were wide, reflecting limited statistical power and uncertainty around effect estimates. Conclusion: This pre-post evaluation provides early insights into the integration of the Fundamentals of Care Framework using a structured implementation strategy. While definitive conclusions regarding effectiveness cannot be drawn, the findings illustrate how behavioural determinants may respond differently during integration processes and highlight the challenges of evaluating complex nursing interventions in real-world clinical settings.

Indexed as

COM-Bfundamentals of carenursing implementationnursing interventionnursing practiceorganizational changepretest-posttest designrelational care

Identifiers

PMID42504209
PMCPMC13401648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.