SynthesisJournal of traumatic stress2026
Pacing in posttraumatic stress disorder therapy: A meta-regression of treatment frequency and completion rates.
Synthesis in Journal of traumatic stress, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study utilized posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) clinical trials repository data to analyze associations between treatment frequency (i.e., weekly or more than weekly) and completion outcomes across cognitive processing therapy (CPT), prolonged exposure (PE), and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). Covariates included treatment type, interactions between treatment type and treatment frequency, total number of treatment sessions, mean age, and study-level risk of bias. All studies that met the eligibility criteria were included with CPT, PE, and EMDR in a secondary analysis to evaluate patterns in operationalizing treatment completion. A total of 84 study arms (k = 66 studies) were included in the primary analysis. Compared to CPT, patients had slightly lower odds of completing PE, odds ratio (OR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.62, 0.86], but were twice as likely to complete EMDR, OR = 2.44, 95% CI [1.82, 3.27]. Increasing the frequency of PE doubled the odds of completion compared to CPT, OR = 2.15, 95% CI [1.55, 2.99]. A Frequency × Treatment interaction signal was nonsignificant for EMDR, OR = 1.61, 95% CI [0.96, 2.71]. Secondary outcomes revealed substantial heterogeneity in definitions of treatment completion, with only one third of all CPT, PE, and EMDR trial arms explicitly defining treatment completion as completing all treatment sessions. Future research should expand these findings to other modalities, as well as standardize operationalizations of treatment completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.