ArticleTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Functional mobility under cognitive load in fibrosing interstitial lung disease: a motor-cognitive dual-task study.
Article in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILD) are associated with reduced exercise capacity and functional limitations. Motor-cognitive dual-task performance refers to the ability to perform a mobility task while simultaneously completing a cognitive task, reflecting the motor-cognitive demands of everyday multitasking. Dual-task performance has not been systematically compared between patients with F-ILD and healthy individuals.
objectivesTo compare motor-cognitive dual-task performance between patients with fibrosing interstitial lung disease and healthy controls, and to examine associations with clinical parameters.
designCross-sectional comparative study.
methodsForty-five patients with F-ILD and 45 age-matched healthy controls completed the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test under single-task and dual-task (serial subtraction) conditions. Dual-task interference (DTI) was computed as the percentage change from single-task performance. Pulmonary function tests, the six-minute walk distance (6MWT), and the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) were administered. Between-group differences were assessed with the Mann-Whitney
resultsCompared to controls, patients with F-ILD demonstrated slower TUG dual-task performance (12.35 vs 10.21 s;
conclusionPatients with F-ILD show significant motor and cognitive dual-task impairments compared with healthy controls, partly independent of conventional lung function measures.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.