ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026
Evaluating the Scale of Natural and Mechanical Airflows for Surface-Based Atmospheric Pollutant Removal.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Removal strategies for atmospheric pollutants are increasingly being considered to mitigate global warming and improve public health. However, the global potential of surface-based removal techniques has not yet been quantified under atmospheric transport. We evaluate the atmospheric pollutant transport to surfaces and assess the potential of surface-based removal technologies across infrastructure. Cities provide the highest transport-limited removal potential, with median annual atmospheric flow rates of 30 GtCO2, 0.06 GtCH4, 0.007 GtNOx, and 0.0001 GtPM2.5 to their total surface area. Cities and HVAC systems have flow rates large enough to potentially remove more than 1 GtCO2/y (1 GtCO2e/y for CH4, 20-year GWP), if laboratory-scale removal efficiencies are achieved under current atmospheric concentrations. HVAC filters have the potential to achieve costs as low as $600 per tCO2 removed ($2000 per tCO2e) if CO2-sorption (CH4-catalyst) technologies are incorporated into their surfaces and maintained through replacement, compared with $3000 per tCO2 ($10,000 per tCO2e) for cities, using literature material and application costs. These estimates exclude regeneration energy, associated electricity use, and downstream processing. These findings suggest that integrating surface-based pollutant removal technologies into infrastructure could support climate mitigation, although further work is needed to assess feasibility, deployment, and cost in application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.