Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42503600›Full record

ArticleAnimal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho

Characterizing Intraruminal Differences of the pH and Fermentation in Cattle.

Elsayed Mickdam, Ezequias Castillo-Lopez, Raul Rivera-Chacon, Qendrim Zebeli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elsayed MickdamNutrition and Clinical Nutrition Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt.
Ezequias Castillo-LopezCentre for Animal Nutrition and Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Raul Rivera-ChaconCentre for Animal Nutrition and Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Qendrim ZebeliCentre for Animal Nutrition and Welfare, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5188-9004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study characterized the association between the ventral and dorsal ruminal pH in cows. The experiment was conducted with six nonlactating rumen-cannulated Holstein cows fed either a grain-rich diet (65% concentrate in dry matter) or a forage-only diet. The dorsal and ventral ruminal pHs were measured in each cow using two identical indwelling systems, which recorded pH every 5 min. Furthermore, the volatile fatty acid concentrations and osmolality were determined in free ruminal liquid (FRL) of the ventral rumen and dorsal mat particle-associated ruminal liquid (PARL) and in feces. Precision and accuracy properties of dorsal ruminal pH and ventral ruminal pH as a measure of reproducibility were statistically evaluated. Data showed that the concordance correlation coefficient, representing the strength of the relationship between the ventral and dorsal ruminal pHs, was high when feeding the grain-rich diet (0.857), but low when feeding the forage-based diet (0.467), with accuracy of 0.917 and 0.525, and precision 0.935 and 0.890 for grain-rich diet and forage-based diet, respectively. The study established a relationship between ventral and dorsal ruminal pHs showing that ventral pH can serve as a proxy for dorsal pH, though this relationship demonstrated higher reproducibility only when feeding grain-rich diets.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietFermentationRumenAnimalsCattleFatty Acids, VolatileFemaleHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationOsmolar ConcentrationFatty Acids, Volatileacidosisfree ruminal liquidparticle associated ruminal liquidruminal pH

Identifiers

PMID42503600
PMCPMC13402330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.