Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42503599›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing2026

From Crisis Response to Recovery: A Two-Wave Qualitative Study of Nursing Leadership Trajectories in Italy (2020-2025).

Nertila Podgorica, Gerhard Müller, Dhurata Ivziku, Daniela Tartaglini, Susanne Perkhofer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nertila PodgoricaDepartment of Nursing Science and Gerontology, Institute of Nursing Science, UMIT TIROL - Private University of Health Sciences and Health Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0131-0815
Gerhard MüllerDepartment of Nursing Science and Gerontology, Institute of Nursing Science, UMIT TIROL - Private University of Health Sciences and Health Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9077-6344
Dhurata IvzikuDepartment of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0091-7524
Daniela TartagliniDepartment of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Susanne PerkhoferUnit for Research and Innovation, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNursing leadership was pivotal during the acute COVID-19 response, yet less is known about how crisis-era leadership practices persisted, changed, or were replaced by new responsibilities during recovery. This study explored nursing leadership trajectories in Italy from the first pandemic wave to 5 years later.

designTwo-wave qualitative study with a longitudinal follow-up subsample and a supplementary 2025 refreshment sample, conducted within a descriptive-interpretive orientation.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with nurse managers and staff nurses in Italian public healthcare settings at two time points: Phase 1 (August-December 2020; n = 22) and Phase 2 (June-September 2025; n = 22). Nine participants were re-interviewed and 13 were newly recruited in 2025, yielding 44 interviews with 35 unique participants. Interviews were transcribed in Italian and analyzed using team-based thematic analysis with a hybrid deductive-inductive strategy. Deductive sensitizing domains were derived from the 2020 dataset and nursing leadership literature, while inductive analysis identified issues newly prominent in 2025. For returning participants, within-case summaries supported longitudinal comparison. Reporting followed COREQ and SRQR guidance.

resultsFindings are reported as patterns of continuity, change, and newly prominent phenomena rather than as uniform within-person change across the full sample. Six themes described leadership trajectories: (1) sustaining emotional support and compassionate leadership; (2) adaptive leadership and system learning; (3) leading digital adoption and technology-enabled care; (4) ethical challenges and moral resilience; (5) coordinating post-COVID pathways across settings; and (6) workforce stewardship, shortages, and retention efforts. Across waves, participants described leadership as shifting from immediate crisis reassurance and improvisation toward institutionalized preparedness, digital change work, cross-sector coordination, and workforce advocacy.

conclusionWithin this sample, nursing leadership was described as moving from acute crisis containment toward a broader portfolio of organizational, ethical, digital, and workforce-oriented responsibilities in the post-pandemic period. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Health organizations should proactively support nurse leaders' capacity for compassionate leadership and moral resilience, invest in digital competencies, and strengthen retention and preparedness strategies to sustain the nursing workforce beyond crisis periods.

Indexed as

COVID-19LeadershipNurse AdministratorsHumansItalyLongitudinal StudiesQualitative Researchadaptive leadershipcompassionate leadershipcomplexity leadershipCOVID‐19longitudinal qualitative researchnursing leadershipqualitative researchtwo‐wave qualitative study

Identifiers

PMID42503599
PMCPMC13402334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.