ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
When appearances deceive: a comparative analysis of acute skin failure in pediatric patients.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute skin failure in children encompasses several life-threatening conditions that can present with strikingly similar, extensive skin detachment despite fundamentally different causes. Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome (SSSS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and severe cutaneous bacterial infections may look almost identical at the bedside, yet differ profoundly in mechanism, treatment, and prognosis. The objective of this study is to describe four consecutive pediatric cases of acute skin failure and to derive a practical, bedside diagnostic approach that helps distinguish infectious from immune-mediated causes early, when therapeutic decisions must be made. We performed a retrospective analysis of four children managed in our Pediatric Intensive Care Unit between 2023 and 2024, comparing clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, treatment, and outcome. The report follows the CARE (CAse REport) guidelines. Three children with SSSS or severe cutaneous bacterial infection recovered completely with antibiotic therapy within 4-7 days. One child with lamotrigine-induced TEN required 42 days of intensive care and multimodal immunomodulation before complete recovery. All four children survived and recovered fully.
conclusionThe extent of skin detachment alone cannot establish the diagnosis. Careful assessment of mucosal involvement, a detailed medication history, and microbiological findings-together with the treatment response at 48-72 h-were the most useful discriminators, determining whether antibiotic therapy or immunomodulation was required. WHAT IS KNOWN: • SSSS, TEN, and severe cutaneous bacterial infections can all cause extensive skin detachment in children and may be difficult to distinguish at first presentation. • The treatments for these conditions differ fundamentally, and inappropriate therapy can worsen the outcome. WHAT IS NEW: • In a comparative series of four children, the extent of skin involvement did not discriminate between causes: two children with 90% body-surface involvement required opposite treatments. • We propose a pragmatic, time-anchored bedside approach-systematic mucosal examination, a structured medication history, and reassessment of treatment response at 48-72 h-to help distinguish infectious from immune-mediated acute skin failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42503590What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.