ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Mapping the global research landscape and knowledge structure of robotic-assisted dental, oral and maxillofacial surgery: a bibliometric analysis.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy for lung cancer: bibliometric and visualized analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To systematically characterize the global research landscape, collaboration patterns, and emerging trends in robotic-assisted dental, oral and maxillofacial surgery through a bibliometric analysis of publications from 2005 to 2025. Publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Bibliometric analyses were conducted using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Carrot2 to evaluate publication trends, international collaborations, co-citation networks, keyword evolution, and emerging research hotspots. A subgroup analysis of publications published after 2020 was performed to identify recent developments in the field. A total of 1,094 publications were included. The field exhibited three developmental phases: gradual growth (2005-2013), fluctuating expansion (2014-2023), and rapid development (2024-2025). The United States, China, and Italy formed the core of the international collaboration network, while transoral robotic surgery (TORS) constituted the primary intellectual foundation of the field. Keyword and co-citation analyses revealed a clear transition from early investigations of surgical feasibility toward applications involving artificial intelligence, digital dentistry, and robotic implantology. Post-2020 analyses identified robotic implantology as a rapidly emerging research frontier, with China playing a leading role in this domain. However, collaboration networks within this emerging area remain relatively fragmented. This study maps the scientific landscape of robotic-assisted dental, oral and maxillofacial surgery, identifying three developmental phases, emerging hotspots (particularly implant robotics), and gaps in international collaboration. These findings provide a comprehensive overview of the field and offer insights into future directions for technological innovation, interdisciplinary collaboration, and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42503578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.