ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Predicting taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy by nailfold capillaroscopy: The CAPNEU pilot study.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTaxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) remains a frequent, dose-limiting toxicity in breast cancer, and reliable pre-treatment predictors are lacking. Nailfold capillaroscopy (NFC) offers a non-invasive window into systemic microvascular morphology, which may reflect vascular susceptibility relevant to neuropathy risk. The objective of the study was to evaluate whether baseline NFC morphology is associated with taxane-related neuropathy severity and symptom burden, and to explore ROC-derived thresholds of NFC parameters for identifying clinically significant neuropathy.
methodsIn this pilot cohort (N = 48) of breast cancer patients receiving taxane-based regimens (docetaxel [DOC], paclitaxel [PAC], or carboplatin-paclitaxel [CPAC]), baseline NFC parameters-capillary density (CD), capillary width (CW), capillary loop diameter (CLD), and capillary length (CL)-were recorded. Neuropathy outcomes were assessed longitudinally using NCI-CTCAE score and EORTC QLQ-CIPN20. Regimen-stratified associations were examined using Spearman's correlation. ROC analyses were conducted in the overall cohort using NCI ≥ 2 vs 0-1 as the binary endpoint; optimal cut-offs were defined by Youden's index.
resultsRegimen-specific patterns were observed. In CPAC (N = 13), CD correlated with NCI (ρ = 0.567, p = 0.043) and CIPN20 (ρ = 0.608, p = 0.028). In PAC (N = 16), no significant correlations were found between NFC parameters and neuropathy outcomes (all p > 0.05), although CIPN20 and NCI remained strongly correlated (ρ = 0.778, p < 0.001) and CLD-NCI showed a trend (ρ = 0.486, p = 0.056). In DOC (N = 19), CL correlated with NCI (ρ = 0.509, p = 0.026) and CIPN20 (ρ = 0.484, p = 0.036), while CW was inversely correlated with CIPN20 (ρ = - 0.510, p = 0.026). In overall ROC analyses, optimal thresholds for predicting NCI ≥ 2 were CD ≥ 8.5 capillaries/mm (sensitivity 77.3%, specificity 42.3%), CW ≥ 31.0 (90.9%, 26.9%), CLD ≥ 18.45 (90.9%, 42.3; highest Youden index 0.332), and CL ≥ 160.1 (72.7%, 46.2).
conclusionsBaseline NFC morphology demonstrated regimen-dependent associations with taxane-related neuropathy outcomes and yielded exploratory ROC thresholds for identifying clinically significant neuropathy (NCI ≥ 2). CLD showed the strongest overall discrimination, while subgroup analyses highlighted distinct candidate markers (CD in CPAC; CL in DOC). These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant validation in larger, independent cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42503543What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.