ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Intramuscular granular cell tumor of the forearm: a rare case and diagnostic challenge.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Granular cell tumors (GCT) are rare neoplasms of neuroectodermal origin that can arise at various anatomical sites. Intramuscular GCTs in the extremities, particularly the upper limbs, are uncommon. MRI may suggest a GCT; however, variable signal intensity patterns complicate the diagnosis, necessitating histopathological confirmation. A 55-year-old woman presented with a gradually enlarging painless mass on the ulnar side of the left forearm. MRI revealed a poorly defined intramuscular lesion within the flexor carpi ulnaris, showing peripheral high signal intensity on T2-weighted and fat-suppressed images, with rim-like enhancement. Gadolinium-enhanced images revealed internal linear structures, interpreted as the stripe sign, within the tumor. Differential diagnoses included undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, myxofibrosarcoma, inflammatory myositis, and granular cell tumors. Needle biopsy suggested the presence of a GCT or inflammatory lesion. Surgical resection revealed large epithelioid-to-polygonal cells with eosinophilic granular cytoplasm, perineural invasion, and lymphocytic infiltration. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positivity for S-100, SOX10, Inhibin, NSE, CD68, and TFE3. The Ki-67 index was 3%, supporting the diagnosis of benign GCT. Although the surgical margins were positive, no recurrence was observed at the two-year follow-up. Peripheral T2 hyperintensity and the stripe sign have been proposed as MRI findings of GCT. However, peripheral T2 hyperintensity is considered to have low specificity, whereas the stripe sign may be more specific to GCT. Although histopathological examination remains essential for the definitive diagnosis, further radiologic evaluation of the utility of the stripe sign is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42503532What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.