ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
From robot assistance to surgical intelligence: global research trends and emerging frontiers of artificial intelligence-enhanced robotic surgery in urology.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To systematically characterize global publication trends, collaboration patterns, intellectual foundations, research hotspots, and emerging frontiers in artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced robotic and robot-assisted surgery in urology. Publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) using a topic search strategy that included three keyword groups: robot-assisted surgery, urologic diseases or procedures, and AI-related technologies. English-language articles and reviews were included. Meeting abstracts, conference proceedings, editorials, letters, non-English publications, studies unrelated to urologic robotic surgery, and studies without substantive AI or intelligent algorithmic content were excluded. RStudio was used for descriptive statistics and annual publication trend visualization. VOSviewer was used for auxiliary bibliometric network construction and visualization. CiteSpace was used to construct collaboration networks, co-citation networks, keyword co-occurrence maps, cluster maps, timeline and time-zone maps, and citation burst maps. A total of 401 records were initially retrieved, and 253 publications were finally included after screening by document type, language, and topical relevance. These comprised 199 articles (78.66%) and 54 reviews (21.34%). Publications in this field began in 2004 and increased rapidly after 2018, reaching a peak of 53 publications in 2025. Because 2026 was an incomplete retrieval year, only 23 publications were recorded. Italy, the United States, the Netherlands, China, and Japan were the leading contributing countries. The University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga, IRCCS Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, and Leiden University Medical Center were the most productive institutions. Keyword clustering showed that the major research hotspots included renal cell carcinoma, augmented reality, image-guided surgery, indocyanine green, machine learning, registration, deep learning, and bladder cancer. AI-enhanced robotic surgery in urology has evolved from early research on registration, navigation, and image-guided surgery toward a surgical intelligence stage characterized by augmented reality, three-dimensional reconstruction, machine learning-based prediction, deep learning-based segmentation, surgical video understanding, and skill assessment. Future studies should prioritize multicenter standardized datasets, sharing of intraoperative video and robotic platform data, model interpretability, prospective validation, and integration into real-world clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42503526What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.