ReviewDysphagia2026
The Influence of Liquid Consistency and Food Texture on Swallowing: A Systematic Review Update.
Review in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diet texture modification is a common intervention for oropharyngeal dysphagia. In 2015, the International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) published a systematic review summarizing evidence on how liquid consistency and food texture influence swallowing behavior. This updated review synthesizes new evidence published between 2012 and 2024 addressing how differences in liquid consistency or food texture affect swallowing in humans. A PROSPERO‑registered, PRISMA‑guided review was conducted using the Covidence platform. A multi‑engine search identified English, peer‑reviewed studies reporting comparable quantitative measures across two or more consistencies defined using IDDSI terminology. Screening and full‑text review were performed in duplicate. Articles were appraised using the FRONTIERS framework, and data synthesis focused on swallowing safety, efficiency, and other physiologic metrics. From 63,247 initial records, 24,196 abstracts were screened and 2,310 full texts reviewed, yielding 465 eligible studies. Of these, 70 studies (from 2017 onward) provided non‑overlapping data mapped to the IDDSI Framework. Sixty‑eight articles reported findings for drink levels 0-4 and 25 for food levels 5-7. Videofluoroscopy was the most common instrumental method used, followed by endoscopy and high‑resolution manometry; other physiologic measures were used less frequently. Across all 25 studies reporting safety outcomes, thicker liquids improved swallowing safety compared with thinner liquids. Among studies reporting efficiency, smaller bolus volumes helped limit residue with thickened liquids. Food textures seldom elicited penetration-aspiration but were associated with increased residue in patient populations. Overall, findings reinforce the need for individualized clinical decision‑making regarding texture modification, informed by careful assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.