ReviewMicrosystems & nanoengineering2026
High pressure transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation induces parameter-dependent cell-type specific effects.
Review in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is a promising technique that has been shown to have high spatial precision, deep brain penetration, and cell-type specificity. Intracranial electrophysiological recordings can measure neural responses to tFUS with high spatial and temporal resolution, but conventional silicon-based multi-electrode arrays cause vibration artifacts induced by increased tFUS pressure. In this study, using an ultraflexible nanoelectric thread electrode, we demonstrate the cell-type selective effects of tFUS under high acoustic pressure with a broad range of ultrasound parameters. We observe that their flexibility mitigates vibrations, eliminating artifacts even at high pressure levels. We observed a positive nonlinear relationship between pressure levels and both time-locked and delayed spiking responses in multiple cell types. We show that higher pressure levels produce distinct response curves across independently varied ultrasound pulse repetition frequency and duty cycle, suggesting the need for further investigation of pressure effects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.