ReviewHealth promotion international2026
The Health System Equity Action Framework: a review of Australian health equity frameworks and their operationalization of the Ottawa Charter.
Review in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Four decades after the Ottawa Charter called on health systems to advance equity, health equity frameworks are increasingly used across Australian health systems. However, little is known about how these frameworks conceptualize or operationalize equity within health systems. This scoping review identified 45 national, state, regional, and local health equity frameworks, with 18 analyzed in depth. Documents from health departments, Local Health Districts, Hospital and Health Services, Primary Health Networks, and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations were examined using structured data extraction and thematic analysis. We found frameworks consistently articulated equity as a fair and just opportunity for health and drew on concepts, such as the social determinants of health and proportionate universalism. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-led frameworks emphasized self-determination, community governance, cultural governance, and accountability mechanisms. While most frameworks established strong principles and policy commitments, they provided limited guidance on implementation and accountability. Frameworks broadly aligned with the Charter's five strategic action areas but engaged less fully with healthy settings, developing personal skills, and contemporary determinants of health. Synthesizing findings across frameworks, we propose the Health System Equity Action Framework, which identifies four modes of health system action and six organizational domains through which equity commitments are operationalized. Equity frameworks play an important role in institutionalizing equity within health systems but often lack mechanisms linking principles to action. The Health System Equity Action Framework provides a conceptual model for translating the Ottawa Charter's commitments into organizational practice four decades after its call to reorient health services towards health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.