Observational studyAnnals of work exposures and health2026
Determinants of respirable crystalline silica exposure in Australian tunnelling.
Observational study in Annals of work exposures and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exposure to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) is a well-established cause of silicosis, lung cancer, and other serious health conditions. Contemporary data describing RCS exposures among tunnel construction workers in Australia has been limited, restricting an understanding of the nature and magnitude of the risk of exposure. This observational study addresses that gap by accessing, compiling, and evaluating the largest known dataset of RCS exposures in contemporary Australian tunnelling. Data were obtained through freedom of information requests and parliamentary records, resulting in 3,288 individual personal exposure measurements across 12 tunnel projects constructed between 2016 and 2024, employing a range of construction methods: via tunnel boring machines, drill and blast, cut-and-cover, and mined tunnelling. Determinants of exposure were assessed on ln-transformed data using linear mixed models (LMM), and included primary location, proportion of crystalline silica content in respirable dust, tunnelling method, or specific above-ground work location. LMMs explained between 53% and 68% of the observed variability in RCS exposures. Underground workers were predicted to have 2.3 times the RCS exposures of above-ground workers (geometric mean [GM] 0.026 vs 0.012 mg/m3); and each 1% increase in the proportion of RCS in respirable dust corresponded to a predicted 5% increase in RCS exposure. Estimated RCS exposure was lower after the reduction of the workplace exposure standard in July 2020 (GM 0.023 vs 0.013 mg/m3). Above-ground exposure varied by location (eg precast facilities, spoil sheds, or general site areas), while tunnelling method influenced RCS exposure underground (eg mined tunnelling, using tunnel boring machines or cut-and-cover methods). While limitations such as variable data quality and incomplete task attribution are acknowledged, the findings support the need for targeted control measures and transparent access to data across tunnel construction environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.