Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42503300›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Pixel-Wise Uncertainty Quantification of Accelerated MRI Reconstruction.

Ilias I Giannakopoulos, Lokesh B Gautham Muthukumar, Yvonne W Lui, Riccardo Lattanzi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilias I GiannakopoulosThe Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2180-5898
Lokesh B Gautham MuthukumarThe Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6990-352X
Yvonne W LuiThe Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9984-9164
Riccardo LattanziThe Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-5903

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Daniel K Sodickson · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Novel Software Tools for Rational Design and Assessment of MR CoilsR01EB024536 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Riccardo Lattanzi · 2017 to 2026
$5.1M
Open-Source Software Tools for Rapid Radiofrequency Coil Modeling and Simulation in MRIK99EB035163 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI GIANNAKOPOULOS, ILIAS · 2024 to 2025
$233k
NIH HHS K99 EB035163NIH HHS P41 EB017183NIH HHS R01 EB024536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal of this work is to introduce an automated method to assess the quality of under-sampled MRI reconstructions. THEORY AND

methodsWe propose a general framework for pixel-wise uncertainty quantification in accelerated MRI reconstructions, enabling automatic identification of unreliable regions without using ground-truth fully-sampled reference images. Our method integrates conformal quantile regression with learning-based image reconstruction methods to estimate statistically rigorous pixel-wise uncertainty intervals. We trained and evaluated our model on Cartesian undersampled brain and knee data obtained from the fastMRI dataset using acceleration factors ranging from 2 to 10. An end-to-end Variational Network was used for image reconstruction.

resultsQuantitative experiments demonstrate strong agreement between predicted uncertainty maps and true reconstruction error. Using our method, the corresponding Pearson correlation coefficient was higher than 90% at acceleration levels at and above four-fold; whereas it dropped to less than 70% when the uncertainty was computed using a simpler heuristic notion (magnitude of the residual). Qualitative examples further show the uncertainty maps based on quantile regression capture the magnitude and spatial distribution of reconstruction errors across acceleration factors, with regions of elevated uncertainty aligning with pathologies and artifacts.

conclusionThe proposed framework enables evaluation of reconstruction quality without access to fully-sampled ground-truth reference images. It represents a step toward adaptive MRI acquisition protocols that may be able to dynamically balance scan time and diagnostic reliability.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrainHumansKneeReproducibility of ResultsUncertaintyconformal predictionmagnetic resonance imagingparallel imagingquantile regressionuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID42503300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.