Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42503071›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of urology2026

Concomitant benign prostatic enlargement and bladder stone surgery versus bladder stone treatment alone: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies by the EAU endourology section.

Angelo Cormio, Carlo Giulioni, Federico Falsetti, Vineet Gauhar, Steffi Kar-Kei Yuen, Stefano Mancon, Eugenio Ventimiglia, Angelo Cafarelli, Begona Ballesta Martinez, Thomas R W Herrmann and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Angelo Cormio *Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Policlinico di Foggia, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Carlo Giulioni *Urology Unit, Villa Igea Private Hospital, Ancona, Italy.
Federico FalsettiUrology Unit, Villa Igea Private Hospital, Ancona, Italy.
Vineet GauharEAU Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Steffi Kar-Kei YuenEAU Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Stefano ManconDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Eugenio VentimigliaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Angelo CafarelliUrology Unit, Villa Igea Private Hospital, Ancona, Italy.
Begona Ballesta MartinezDepartment of Urology, University Hospital del Vinalopo, Alicante, Spain.
Thomas R W HerrmannEAU Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Luigi CormioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, LUM University, Strada Statale 100 km 18, Casamassima, 70010, Bari, Italy.
Daniele CastellaniEAU Endourology Section, Arnhem, The Netherlands. castellanidaniele@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7354-9190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMen with benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) frequently present with concomitant bladder stones (BS), yet the optimal surgical strategy remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of concomitant BPE/BS surgery against BS treatment alone.

methodsFollowing the 2020 PRISMA framework, a comprehensive search was conducted on 9 March 2026. Binary outcomes were pooled using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method and reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous outcomes were assessed using inverse variance with 95% CI. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I.

resultsSeven comparative studies involving over 500 patients were included. Quality assessment revealed some concerns in the overall risk of bias for the single randomized trial, while non-randomized studies showed moderate (3 studies) and high overall risk of bias (3 studies). Concomitant surgery was associated with a significantly lower odds of BS recurrence (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.10-0.33, p < 0.00001) and better urinary symptoms at last follow-up (mean IPSS difference - 3.09 points, p < 0.00001) compared with BS surgery alone. Minor complications (Clavien 1-2) were more frequent in the concomitant surgery group (OR 4.35, p < 0.0001), while major complications and stone-free rates did not differ significantly, though the comparison was likely underpowered for major complications. The rate of subsequent BPE surgical procedure in patients who had BS surgery alone ranged from 10% to 41%.

conclusionConcomitant BPE and BS surgery substantially reduces stone recurrence and improves lower urinary tract symptoms without meaningfully increasing serious perioperative risk, supporting its adoption in selected cases when BS is related to BPE with bladder outlet obstruction.

Indexed as

Prostatic HyperplasiaUrinary Bladder CalculiHumansMaleUrologyBenign Prostatic HyperplasiaCystolithotripsyHolmium laser enucleation of the prostateTransurethral resection of prostateUrinary Bladder Calculi

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.