Article in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Natascha RosenDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8706-7053
Guillermo Rodriguez-RealDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2492-1619
Alexander F Vom SteinDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6910-7792
Luca D SchreursDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8510-6035
Trong-Hieu NguyenDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Viktoria KohlhasDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8133-1001
Thanh-Tung TruongDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3795-388X
Maximilian KochDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sebastian ReinartzDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Nina ReinartDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Phuong-Hien NguyenDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3249-7264
Michael HallekDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, CECAD Center of Excellence on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7425-4455
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB1530Deutsche Krebshilfe 70112403
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Targeting the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) to remove tumour-associated macrophages is being explored as cancer therapy. This strategy may be relevant for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), which strongly depends on support from myeloid cells. However, it is unclear how CSF1R expression affects the CLL microenvironment and leukaemic progression. To examine this question, we created Eμ-TCL1 transgenic mice for CLL with Csf1r haploinsufficiency to investigate changes in myeloid cells, Csf1r expression and leukaemia progression. Csf1r haploinsufficiency reduced Csf1r expression on circulating monocytes, but did not significantly impair its expression in tissue macrophages or change the overall numbers of monocytes or macrophages in blood and lymphoid tissues. Eμ-TCL1 transgenic mice with lower Csf1r levels had less leukaemia during early disease, but this effect faded with disease progression, and their overall survival was similar to controls. Furthermore, in vitro co-culture demonstrates that depletion of CSF1R expression on cell lines did not affect the survival or migration of patient-derived CLL cells. In summary, our results show that while the CSF1R pathway is important for maintaining the myeloid cells that support CLL, simply reducing CSF1R expression has only a limited effect on disease progression. Attempts to target the CSF1R for leukaemic therapy might benefit from a stronger depletion of macrophages or the combination with other agents.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Reduced colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor expression in myeloid cells has limited impact on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia progression. · full record | OpenQuestion