ArticleBJU international2026
AI-based anatomical recognition for bladder neck dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Article in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system for anatomical recognition that can automatically identify key anatomical structures during bladder neck dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), a critical yet technically demanding step. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe constructed an AI model and evaluated its accuracy using 210 RARP videos from two institutions. A total of 1353 frames of bladder neck dissection were extracted from 25 videos, and the boundaries of the prostate, bladder and retrotrigonal layer were annotated. The DeepLabV3+ model was employed in developing the anatomical recognition AI model. An active learning approach was applied by iteratively retraining the model using frames with poor initial performance. The model was further evaluated using 202 independent test frames derived from seven surgeons. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the intersection over union (IoU) and Dice similarity coefficient.
resultsThe IoU of the initial AI model was 0.41 for the prostate and 0.44 for the bladder. The retrained model demonstrated improved segmentation performance, with final IoU values of 0.75 and 0.68, respectively. In an independent test dataset derived from seven surgeons, segmentation performance for the prostate and bladder was maintained.
conclusionWe developed an AI system for anatomical recognition and improved its accuracy by using retraining processes. The retrained AI model demonstrated high accuracy, and its use is anticipated to support surgeons and aid in the education of novice surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.