Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42503033›Full record

ArticleBJU international2026

AI-based anatomical recognition for bladder neck dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Shinnosuke Fujiwara, Keishiro Fukumoto, Masashi Takeuchi, Yuichiro Konnai, Yota Yasumizu, Nobuyuki Tanaka, Toshikazu Takeda, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Takeo Kosaka, Hirofumi Kawakubo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shinnosuke FujiwaraDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9241-2373
Keishiro FukumotoDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5941-4000
Masashi TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3797-432X
Yuichiro KonnaiDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yota YasumizuDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyuki TanakaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshikazu TakedaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1196-8642
Kazuhiro MatsumotoDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-0999
Takeo KosakaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi KawakuboDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4929-5482
Masaru IshidaDepartment of Urology, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama-shi, Japan.
Yuko KitagawaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mototsugu OyaDepartment of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24K19659Public Foundation of Chubu Science and Technology Centerthe Japanese Society of Endourology and Robotics
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system for anatomical recognition that can automatically identify key anatomical structures during bladder neck dissection in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), a critical yet technically demanding step. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe constructed an AI model and evaluated its accuracy using 210 RARP videos from two institutions. A total of 1353 frames of bladder neck dissection were extracted from 25 videos, and the boundaries of the prostate, bladder and retrotrigonal layer were annotated. The DeepLabV3+ model was employed in developing the anatomical recognition AI model. An active learning approach was applied by iteratively retraining the model using frames with poor initial performance. The model was further evaluated using 202 independent test frames derived from seven surgeons. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the intersection over union (IoU) and Dice similarity coefficient.

resultsThe IoU of the initial AI model was 0.41 for the prostate and 0.44 for the bladder. The retrained model demonstrated improved segmentation performance, with final IoU values of 0.75 and 0.68, respectively. In an independent test dataset derived from seven surgeons, segmentation performance for the prostate and bladder was maintained.

conclusionWe developed an AI system for anatomical recognition and improved its accuracy by using retraining processes. The retrained AI model demonstrated high accuracy, and its use is anticipated to support surgeons and aid in the education of novice surgeons.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrinary BladderHumansMaleProstateanatomical recognitionartificial intelligenceprostate cancerrobot‐assisted radical prostatectomyurological surgery

Identifiers

PMID42503033
PMCPMC13655194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.