Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42502828›Full record

ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026

Glenoid osteochondritis dissecans in 9 baseball players: arthroscopic management and radiographic outcomes.

Motoyuki Fujisawa, Masafumi Hara

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Motoyuki FujisawaHara Baseball Medical Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hisatsune Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Masafumi HaraHara Baseball Medical Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hisatsune Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glenoid osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a rare condition seen occasionally in throwing athletes. Early diagnosis using conventional radiography is challenging. The aim of this study was to report on a series of baseball players receiving treatment for glenoid OCD. This retrospective case series included 9 baseball players with glenoid OCD who underwent arthroscopic surgery with a minimum of one-year follow-up. Plain radiographs were routinely obtained in the arm-elevated position (140-150°) to compare glenoid morphology between the throwing and non-throwing shoulders. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used for definitive diagnosis and lesion assessment. Surgical procedures were selected based on intraoperative arthroscopic findings, including transarticular drilling for stable lesions and bone marrow stimulation for unstable lesions. The mean age at surgery was 16.6 ± 1.7 years, with a mean follow-up of 30.5 ± 12.7 months. All lesions were located in the posterior glenoid. Radiographic healing was confirmed on post-operative computed tomography at a mean of 12.0 ± 4.2 months, with no progression observed in any case. Eight of 9 patients (89%) successfully returned to play (RTP) at their preinjury competitive level at a mean of 9.2 ± 4.1 months post-operatively. Arm-elevated radiographs comparing both shoulders may serve as a useful adjunctive screening method for detecting glenoid OCD in throwing athletes. Arthroscopic treatment tailored to lesion stability was associated with a favorable RTP rate in this small case series; however, careful consideration of surgical timing is necessary.

Indexed as

Arthroscopic treatmentBaseball playerBone marrow stimulationGlenoidOsteochondritis dissecansThrowing athletes

Identifiers

PMID42502828
PMCPMC13400214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.