ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2025
Benchmarking and Improving Foundation Model Dietary Estimates from Meal Images.
Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate quantifying dietary contents, such as calories, proteins, carbohydrates, and fats, from an image of a meal plate is vital for managing diabetes. Recently, Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have excelled in complex vision-language tasks due to their use of very large, highly diverse data. This study benchmarked the use of seven LMMs that include full and lightweight models of GPT, Gemini, and Llama for nutrition estimation based on Google's Nutrition5k dataset and our own phone-collected DonateAndLearn dataset. We analyzed the performance of LMMs and the RGB-D fusion model, in which the RGB-D model was specifically trained using Nutrition5k data. On our DonateAndLearn dataset, the full-weight versions of LMMs significantly outperformed the RGB-D fusion model, suggesting superior generalization capacity of the LMMs. We propose a method to integrate Nutrition5k images with phone-collected meal images that often lack the physical sizes of objects in the images. We applied scaled phone images to the RGB-D fusion model to predict the total weight of food in each phone-collected image. Using the predicted weight, the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of carbohydrate prediction using the Gemini 2.5 Flash model decreased from 56.6% to 39.5%, based on 78 test cases in the DonateAndLearn dataset. Furthermore, when the ground-truth food weight was provided to Gemini2.5 Flash and GPT-4.1, the MAPE further improved dramatically to 20.2% and 26.8%, respectively, which underscores the critical value of integrating physical information into dietary assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.