ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Grade 3 Primary Graft Dysfunction Following Lung Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to identify key predictors for Grade 3 Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation. Machine learning (ML) algorithm models were constructed for early clinical identification of high-risk PGD patients based on these predictors. Methods: A total of 297 lung transplant recipients from December 2018 to December 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. Patient classification followed the 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria. Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for the logistic regression (LR), K-Nearest neighbors (KNN), random forest (RF), and decision tree (DT) models in validation cohort were 0.6960, 0.6307, 0.9989, and 0.9138, respectively. The RF algorithm was selected as the optimal predictive model for Grade 3 PGD risk after lung transplantation. The RF model showed a maximum net benefit of 0.2837 at a threshold probability of 0.6 in the training set. In the test cohort, the maximum net benefit was 0.3034 at a threshold probability of 0.5. The net benefit difference between the two datasets was minimal (mean difference: -0.0034). This finding reflected robust generalization capability for the RF model. The most influential features for the RF model's predictions were intraoperative red blood cell transfusion volume, preoperative oxygenation index, donor cold ischemia time, preoperative NT-proBNP, white blood cell count, use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during surgery, and CRP level. Conclusion: The RF model effectively predicted the risk of Grade 3 PGD after lung transplantation. This model showed potential for providing decision support in the early identification of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.